Your friends in the government are suggesting you pay twice into the Universal Access Fund -- the pot that subsidizes rural telecommunications -- by forcing companies like Vonage to pay into the fund, despite the fact that they're already paying those fees to their telco providers.
Look, I get it. I understand that there needs to be reasonable access to telecommunication services in sparsely populated areas, but not on the backs of taxpayers tens states away; ultimately, people choose where they live.
With companies like ExtremeSat, a community, a county or a coop group can provide universal access to broadband and telecommunications services. It may cost a bit more, but isn't that to be expected if you live in the boonies?
Here's an easy answer to the tax: if the FCC wants to tax net phone calls for anyone with a telephone number, then don't have a telephone number. There are plenty of free examples of free VoIP applications that only require both ends to have broadband and a user ID.
Ultimately, I think the free market should be the decider in such cases, not pseudo-authorities like the FCC.
New taxes could slam Net phone users | CNET News.com
How datacenters are eating American prosperity
Server farms are "eating" American prosperity by extracting finite local resources—like land, water, and grid capacity—while off...
-
Atheists state that it may not be said that there is no god, but that it may be said that there is no reason to think there is one. It is an...
-
When you run a business and wait on customers who have chosen you over a sea of competitors, you owe it to them to objectively judge how wel...
