Monday, August 25, 2003

Home Energy Panel

Experts in the industry are predicting double and triple utility bills this
winter.  This is cause for great concern for all of us, but the expected
high energy prices will devastate people in the lowest income ranges.  As a
public service to our community, The Wise Guys would like to invite a panel of
experts to do a special show on improving the efficiency of homes, both for
existing structures and new construction.


The panel

We have invited Brian Leech of Alger-Leechman Heating & Cooling to be on
the panel, as well as the a PR spokesman for MidAmerican Energy.  We'll
also invite a builder to come on and join us.  We'll address several issues
in our forum:



  • What can consumers do to improve efficiency?

  • What can builders do to improve efficiency?

  • What can heating and cooling professionals do to improve efficiency?

  • Are there incentive programs to make it possible for home owners to spend
    money on improving the efficiency of their homes?


We'll let you know when we will hold our forum.  Please href="mailto:danny@radiowiseguys.com">send us your questions in advance so
we can answer them on the air.


Straw bail homes

What's the building cost of a straw bale home vs. a stick or brick home


Cement homes

How much do they cost?  Are they cheaper to build than stick
homes?  Is there an abundant supply of straw?


Berm or underground homes

How much do they cost?  Are they cheaper to build than stick homes?


Existing homes

What can be done to modify an existing stick or brick home to have a
dramatically higher energy efficiency?  How much would it cost?  Wind
breaks?  Trees?  Solar panels?  Solar reflectors?


"R" values

What are "R" values?  Are they an accurate means by which to
measure the level of insulation?  Can an "R" value change with
the outside temperature?  What materials are most/least affected by extreme
hot or cold temperatures?  How to fiberglass and recycled cellulose
materials hold up under extreme temperatures?


Assessing your home

Assess your current situation.  Ask your utility company or a heating
and cooling professional to give you a free energy audit of your home.  You
can also follow most of the audit steps yourself.  Most energy companies
provide steps for assessing your home's energy efficiency.  Check windows
and doors for leaks.  Inspect the entire outside of your home for holes and
cracks where air leaks might occur.  Check insulation for adequate
"R" values.  Check heating and cooling equipment for best
efficiency.


Assessing costs of improving efficiency

Will it be cost-effective or even viable to replace appliances, insulate
your home and repair cracks and holes?  Can
you spread costs our over a period of time?  These are important
questions.  Compare projected costs of not doing repairs with replacing or
repairing Estimate whether you can save money.  Are there financing options
available to home owners/


What can renters do to keep their utilities down?


Alternative energy

Is it possible to get cost benefits from solar, water and wind energy? 
Is it feasibly to buy your own solar panels and windmills to produce
electricity?  Is it feasible to buy solar water heaters and air
conditioners?  Will the utilities buy back unused energy?  Are there
any DIY (do-it-yourself) alternative energy solutions?


Tips for reducing your energy usage


Near-field lighting using low voltage DC lamps.

You usually don't actually need to light an entire room, and using light only where you need it is far more efficient than lighting whole rooms. Either use smaller florescent lights or miniature DC lamps to really cut down on usage. You can even use motion detectors to automatically turn on lights when you are in the area. The real benefit of using this technology is that the lights can be set to turn off after a period of no motion, thereby cutting
energy usage.


Weatherizing kits

You can buy a wide variety of weatherizing kits from discount stores. 
They include weather stripping for doors and windows, plastic coverings for
windows, wall plate insulators, foam tape and calk.


Close off outside doors

Do you really need to use the sliding door during cold months?  Even
hot months?  Particularly sliding doors let a lot of air pass through the
channels.  Perhaps you can seal the door to prevent it from being used.


Seal up pet doors

Pet doors might seem like a better alternative to opening the doors to let
them pass.  But many of these doors are very porous and allow a lot of air
leakage -- 24 hours a day.


Power use scheduling

Most homes are empty during the day and quiet during sleeping hours and you usually only use energy during the waking hours that you're home. so if it prudent to do so, you can use timers or simply unplug appliances and such that draw current even when not being used. 
Here are some things you might unplug while you're not using them:



  • Computers and peripherals

    Turn off monitors, printers, scanners, etc. when not in use.

  • clocks

    Many people have far too many older clocks that are powered by AC and that have lighted dials, etc. that draw more energy than new ones that have momentary backlights. Get rid of all the clocks you don't need to use, as even battery powered clocks cost money when the batteries die.

  • Fridges and Freezers

    It costs money to store food. If you're on a tight energy budget, consider unplugging the ones you don't really need.

  • close off rooms

    Make your living space more efficient. Don't use rooms just because you have them. You can greatly reduce your energy usage by closing off entire areas of your home. Use caution when restricting heating of water pipes. If you're going to cut the heat, get some heating tape for pipes that will be vulnerable to freezing.

  • Unplug the TV, coffee pot, etc.

    Some coffee pots (Like most Bunns) keep the water warm even when not in use. This can not only be a fire hazard, but costs you money.

  • Hot tubs and swimming pools

    If high energy usage is an issue for you, consider the benefits of discontinuing use of hot tubs and swimming pools. These are considered by most to be luxury items -- unless there is a genuine medical need for them.

  • Heating and cooling

    It would be ideal if you didn't have to heat or cool your home while you're not there. But the fact is that it takes more energy to re-cool a house than to leave it on, perhaps at reduced load. An air conditioner's toughest job is removing the humidity from carpet and furniture. Once the humidity levels is down, re-cooling a room is not much of a problem. so consider leaving your air on all the time, increasing the temperature to 80 to 85 degrees higher during the day and during sleeping hours. the air is surprisingly comfortable at 80 degrees if the humidity is down and you have a
    ceiling fan running.

  • Fans

    Except for the use of window or attic fans, there is no benefit to having a fan running when one is in the room to enjoy it. Turn them of when you leave the room for more than a few minutes.


Sunday, August 24, 2003

Ten Commandments Judge Suspended

Alabama's Chief Justice Roy Moore has been suspended as a result of disobeying an order from a higher court. The order was to remove the Ten Commandments
monument he had placed his court house.

According to court documents, Moore was twice offered opportunities to stay the removal order and take the issue to the US Supreme Court, but the judge refused to follow established court
rules and failed in any hopes to do so. When Judge Moore finally made the appropriate request, it was
simply too late, and the higher court subsequently rejected such filings.

We hear heated discussions on the church-state separation issue, but this point comes down to following established guidelines. In two conference calls, members of the US District Court asked Moore if he wanted to have the order stayed; to take it to the US Supreme Court,
but Moore declined.

In arguing for keeping the monument in the court house, a few are suggesting that we look to the strongly held religious beliefs of the framers of our Constitution,
a concept that seems absurd to me.  I understand that most of our founding fathers were
deeply religious men and I'm glad for that.  But I believe they felt the first amendment protected us from religious persecution,
one of the very unpleasantries people fled other lands to escape.

I accept
that our laws are based on biblical laws such as the Ten Commandments.  I
also accept that all rights come first from God.  But I refuse to draw the
conclusion that, because the framers were religious, that they meant for our
government to exhibit any religious color.  On the contrary.  In order
to ensure freedom of religion, we need to keep the government out of our
churches, and the churches out of our government, or a bias can creep in that
will establish a certain religion.

The brick and mortar of our society was
laid by religious men and women.  Reading their writings, it becomes
obvious that the virtue of their labors was indeed borne out of religion. 
I thank God for their virtue, but I commend their restraint for the good of all
men and women.

I hope that all individuals would consider consulting religious clerics in
order for guidance, including congressmen, presidents and judges.  I hope
they recognize the importance of the virtues of religion -- in fact that the
very foundation of our society was established because of it.  I reject,
however, the notion that these people of government should sanction religion in
the name of the government in any way, including the adorning of court houses
and public schools of America with symbols which have the clear effect of
promoting religion.


Thursday, August 21, 2003

Bullet-proof your email

So you're back online after another vicious attack on your computer. 
You're sick of all the troubles you've been having.  How are you going to
prevent this kind of this from happening again?  Consider using an email
program that is nearly virus proof, like Pine, a text-based program that
composes and displays text email, which is, after all, what email was intended
to be.


Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Express are huge targets for attackers because
they're hugely popular (Outlook express comes with every new Windows computer)
and because there are so many features to exploit.  Don't get me
wrong.  The features Microsoft build into their software help make using it
easy and pleasant -- for the most part.  But remember that the more bells
and whistles you build into a program, there more places there are for breakage
(and expoits) to occur.


Old-school computer users sit back and chuckle at all the troubles people
have with their fancy-schmancy, graphics laden, gadget-heavy computers. 
The old-schoolers not only remember the good old days of text-only email, but
many still use it exclusively.  Let's look at an email program called Pine
It was designed for use on Unix computers and is ported to many other operating
systems, like Linux and even Windows.  Later versions of Pine strip HTML
coding from messages and display them as plain text.  Attachments can be
easily detached and stored without executing them.


How can I do text-only email?  There are several possibilities. 
You might, for instance, have shell access to your email account.  If this
is the case, perhaps you can use pine in a telnet window on your computer. 
If you don't have shell access available to you from your ISP, then build your
own server machine out of an old computer you have laying around the house.


If you have or can come up with an old 486 or early Pentium-class machine
that has 32 or more megs of RAM, you can install a network card and a free
distribution of Linux; set it up to fetch mail from all your outside POP3 and
IMAP accounts (it won't work with free web-based mail like Hotmail and Yahoo!
without some external programming); then logon and type 'pine' at the command
prompt and start corresponding.  Chances are, you'll never have a virus
problem again.  You'll not only have a full-fledged email server, but the
added features of a file and print server too, and at no more cost than the old
computer you already own!

Gateways vs. Access Points

Some time ago, I had an occasion to set up a wireless network for some
friends.  They had a broadband connection to the Internet through a cable
modem provided by Mediacom and two desktop computers.  I suggested they buy
an 802.11b gateway and 802.11b cards for each computer they wanted connected.


After installing and connecting all the hardware they bought, each computer
seemed to be able to connect to the Internet fine, and we were able to do some
file and print sharing between them.  But it all wasn't fine.  I
quickly discovered that the computers could surf the net, but not at the same
time.  It is then that I discovered that they'd purchased an access point
and not a gateway.


A wireless access point does one thing.  It broadcasts a single RJ-45
jack to multiple wireless network cards.  It merely provides direct
connectivity to the public.  In this case, the public network sees all the
computers connected.  This is a problem because Mediacom (and many other
cable companies) will only assign you one IP address.  Not one for each
computer you have plugged into their network, just one period.  So when we
connected the AP and fired up the first computer, we were fine.  Mediacom
asked us to verify our new mac address, as expected.  Then we fired up the
second computer.  And again, we were asked to verify the mac address. 
Doing this, we got on the net with that machine too.  So all's well, right?


Wrong!  Being asked to verify a new mac address the second time was a
bad sign.  It meant Mediacom could see the mac addresses on each machine,
which told us that the wireless base was not fronting for us, but was exposing
each machine attached to it to the network, requiring each machine to obtain its
own IP address, which Mediacom will not do for more than one machine
simultaneously.


Ah hah!  It's an access point, not a router.


If my friends had purchased a wireless gateway instead of the simple wireless
access point, the gateway would have appeared to Mediacom as a single computer,
and only asking to update the mac address once, and that mac address would have
been for the gateway and not one for each of the computers.  With a
gateway, we not only insulate each of the internal computers from the Internet,
but we sort of fool Mediacom into thinking we only have one machine connected to
their network.  A gateway acts as the go-between for all Internet requests
coming from inside the network -- so instead of each computer requesting its own
IP address from Mediacom directly, each computer would ask the gateway (and not
Mediacom) for their IP address, which would in turn assign each machine a local
IP address from a bank of local subnet addresses.


Lesson learned.  Access points are fine if you're already behind a
firewall and are not limited to the number of IP addresses you can
request.  But if you're using a cable or DSL modem, make sure you use a
gateway to connect several computers to the network or you may have the same
problem we had.


Wireless home networking update:

Lots of people assume that you need
broadband (cable or DSL modem) to have wireless networking.  Not
so.  You can still use your single dialup connection and share it
with all users on your home or office network.  But there are a few
complications, including slower surfing and downloading.


In order to share dial up internet, you
need to have a modem doing the dialing.  There are a number of ways
to get dialup internet into your network, but none are all that common,
or even very easy:



  • A dedicated server, such a
    Linux computer with a modem and a
    network card.  This machine will act as a gateway between the
    Internet and your local network.  Whenever someone tries to get
    on the net, the server will make a dialup connection.  You can
    also use it as a file and print server.  The advantages here
    are that can be very cheap to set up and use and it is extremely
    feature-packed -- but the downside is that it's very complicated to
    setup and maintain.

  • A Windows computer that is
    turned on and available to dial up the ISP whenever someone on the
    network wants to get on the Internet.  More expensive, but
    easier to set up.

  • A gateway device that has a
    built-in modem, designed specifically to provide dialup access to
    the Internet in this way, such as the base station one below.


Here's what I suggest for most home/small
office users on a shoestring budget:


The base station is a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=ZoomAir+Wireless+IG-4150+Wireless+Gateway"
target="_blank">ZoomAir Wireless IG-4150 Wireless Gateway
for under
$70, connected to either your phone line (56K dialup) or your Cable/DSL
modem (usually 256Kbps to 1,500 Kbps).  What makes this unit unique
is that it has a built-in 56K modem where most all Gateways/Routers do
not.  Those gateways and routers that do facilitate 56K dialup
connections to the Internet only do so through a serial port which you
must connect an additional external modem.  The ZoomAir Gateway is
configured to dial and logon to your ISP using a web browser.  I
assume this is a dial on demand situation, so that whenever a computer
needs an Internet connection, the modem will make that connection, and
hang up after a period of in-activity.



The downside of using this
particular gateway is that computers and the software running think
they're always connected to the net, so may make frequent connections
to update software such as weather bugs, chat clients, anti-virus
software definition updates and automatic Windows updates, and
therefore may never be inactive.  This can increase your ISP
service charges if you are billed on an hourly basis.  It would
be beneficial if you could configure the modem to ONLY dial up during
specific hours of the day, so that you could 'throttle' usage to stay
below a certain number of hours a month.  I have no idea if this
feature is built into this gateway.



802.11b Wireless network adaptors
for all computers on your network.



How it works:


The base station connects to the internet
through either the phone line or your cable or DSL modem.  It then
sets up a private local area network, isolated from the outside. 
It assigns local IP addresses to each computer that connects to it in
ranges that are not accessible from outside your LAN and Internet
connection.


Wednesday, August 20, 2003

NBC's West Wing hits DVD market

The premiere season of "The West Wing" is expected to be realeased late this year on four discs and will retail for $60. Gag reels to commentaries may also appear on the set. More...

Yahoo! tries to knock off Google

In a bold move, Yahoo!, one of Google's best customers, has acquired some contender Internet search engines to go head-to-head with the biggest dog on the block. Microsoft isn't fdar nehind, chomping at Yahoo!'s heels. More...

Worst virus week ever

F-Secure says Sobig.F is among four major virus threats discovered in a week. It's an email worm that sends a .pif or .scr file to recipients in users' address books. It also prepares the computer to receive orders and tries to download files from the Internet, according to one news report. If the infected computer is on a shared network, the worm tries to copy itself to the other computers on that network. The worm is programmed to stop spreading on Sept. 10. More...

Tuesday, August 19, 2003

Israel attacks the US

Got your attention, didn't I?  What's this about?  In June, 1967, during the Six Day War, Israeli war planes attacked and nearly sunk a US spy ship staffed with NSA intelligence gathering personnel. 
Israel calls the attack a horrible accident; a case of mistaken identity. Survivors and conspiracy theorists say that's a load of crap. 
You decide.  I'll deliberately leave out my viewpoint in all this, and instead suggest you read what's being
written about the incident.  Do your own Google searches and read the words on the web sites on the two
sides and make up your own mind.  Here are some links in no particular
order:


Here's one scenario of what might have happened:


A zealous LBJ wanted to do right by Israel, since just 19 years prior, the US had sponsored Israel's very statehood, and he knew in advance of their plans to spank surrounding enemies who'd sworn to push the Jews into the ocean. LBJ nods in blind approval and vows he will know nothing of it. LBJ figured it would be ugly, but he didn't have to know unpleasant details of the gore. But he would later be shocked, for his own people would pay with their lives and dignity for LBJ's wink of an eye.


During this spanking, Israeli leadership learn there's a US intelligence ship lying quietly just 19 miles off the coast, watching the whole bloody mess unfold (like the execution of
Egyptians in an Israeli firing squad). Israel is slightly dismayed (a sentiment LBJ will soon share) at the NSA intrusion, and so tries to sink the snoopy ship to silence it.


It was a knee-jerk response and not well planned, but it had to be done. They'd do damage control and spin a tail of mistaken identity later, but right now, stopping Liberty is priority or there could be a very large audience and a paper trail of evidence against them.


So, despite that Israeli Air Force war plane pilots could plainly see what they were doing, orders to destroy Liberty are delivered and carried out, as dutiful warriors must, without question.


And what could LBJ say? He's all but fighting the Egyptians alongside the Israelis. How could he defend Liberty and not take action against Israel's air force? He had no choice. He had to turn a blind eye to the slaying of his own countrymen or burn in hell for not protecting the chosen ones. It would take generations to repair the damage on Israel's world status if the world knew the truth -- at least the official truth.


So, while commanders of the sixth fleet were sending warplanes to defend Liberty, LBJ turns them back.


Monday, August 18, 2003

American Power Failure!

Can I just say, "Oh my God!" When I heard Rush Limbaugh playing the blame game and turning the eastern seaboard power outage of last week into a partisan issue, it made me sick to my stomach.

I think the power companies have going one of the best games in town. They do a much needed service, providing for us the so-called comforts of home. But he who provides for our needs can certainly take away what we need, and that's just too much power for one industry to have. And don't tell me that's a partisan problem.

I think more than power companies lost a lot of steam last week. I just hope the failure did some good, that is awakened us to several of the issues that face us.

Is anyone else tired of listening to politicians bicker? Republicans want to impose religious belief on me. Democrats want to socialize the world. I hate them both equally! Fact is, democrats and republicans alike want more than anything to be elected into power without regard for the good of the people. Corporate America wants to get more and more of consumers' paychecks and will buy politicians to get it. Borders will not be protected because democrats want immigrant votes and republicans need the low wages. Health care will never be affordable if insurance lobbies continue to exist.

We all know "drunk driving" is a real problem in America. Everyone, it seems, looks to the 'drunk' part of the equation and fails to understand the huge impact mere 'driving' has on public health & safety and energy issues. While we know driving is a privilege, our society treats the function like a Constitutional right, akin to liberty and freedom. That's a load of crap. Infrastructure is one of the few elements of our society that should be standardized by the federal government, and it should be done through technology, driven by safety and efficiency.

People are human, and humans are not well suited to manage very complicated traffic considerations, such as road conditions, flow and weather. Our brains are not equipped to take in all the information needed to be safe and efficient with multi-ton equipment on busy roads. It's a scientific fact.

And bigger is not better. Jets, trains and busses keep getting bigger; bull̢۪s eye more prominently affixed thereto. They have, are and will always be targets for terrorist attacks. Small vehicles, evenly spread, are not.

The whole transportation infrastructure needs a major overhaul, and quickly. Isn't it time to start turning the corner here? Isn't it time for America to demonstrate leadership in the world and introduce a state-of-the-art transportation model that can work everywhere?

Education is a hot button issue too. Why? Because tax payers don't get their money's worth. All it takes is a few good leaders to do the right thing here. Stop taking bribes and start paying attention to the needs of the kids. Schools should be guarded and monitored by more parents and fewer police and administrators. Bigger is not better. More schools in more and smaller multi-use structures. Air conditioning is not a must. Bussing is not a given. Extra-curricular activities should not be subsidized by taxes. Teaching kids comes first, and should be conducted by those best suited and not chosen through arbitrary, political standards.

Don't get me started on free trade and the border issues. When American companies recruit illegal aliens onto American soil though such porous, we're going to have problems with living wages and national security.

Is insurance really a good thing?

Nearly everyone has insurance of some type, and most have several: car insurance, life insurance and medical insurance. But is the basic concept of insurance, paying insurance premiums and subsequently filing claims, really the best way to pay for unplanned expenses?

Let's look at the benefits and the effects:

Insurance is good because it allows us to better buget our money, and provides a safety net in case a crisis arrises. But let's look beyond the known benefits and get to the actual societal effect.

Most people agree that prices consumers pay for goods and services should be set by free market forces, such as supply and demand, cost of living and simple competition. But when you put the insurance company between you and the doctor, as in health insurance, then basic market forces are all but lost because the insurance company -- and not you -- writes the checks to pay the bills, which frees the health care industry to increase prices to levels far above what consumers can normally afford.

For this reason, I am beginning to wonder if todays insurance models don't add up to social corruption.

Before the insurance model existed...

It used to be simple. Industries mostly didn't gouge their customers because they'd have priced themselves right out of business. People generally paid cash as they went. The breaking point on prices was relatively far lower because the deep pockets people went after when they were injured by medical malpractice or in a car crash were simply not present.

The insurance model is socially corrupt because facilitates gouging.

Employer-provided health insurance...

My electronics instructor had a saying which applied closely in electronic circuits: You can't get something from nothing. You can increase the voltage, but at the expense of amperage. This applies in life as well. When an entire society demands that employers provide health care to employees, there is a feeling that we're getting something for nothing.

I guarantee someone is paying, and it's probably you.

Perhaps the company you work for is passing some of the health care cost on to consumers of its goods and services, but my sense is that the lion's share of the health cost comes in the form of limits on wages and other benefits. And that has a dramatic effect on standards of living.

The pie is only so big, right? The smart people will figure out how to get larger and larger pieces of that pie. The really smart people will get laws passed that will guarantee them a piece of the pie.

The Peer-pressure Model

Employer-provided health care causes a social phenomenon not seen before. Because we don't pay our own bills in a 'pay-as-you-go' system, fat people, smokers and people who have a lot of kids are scoffed by their co-workers. Why? Cost sharing. It's an easy relationship to draw; the more babies YOU make, the more MY health care costs.

I don't think it's fair, but I don't blame co-workers who choose an unhealthy lifestyle for themselves. (Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.) No, I attribute the problem to socially inept leadership; politicians and industry lobbies, for instance, who permit this kind of model to exist in the first place.

Yes, you might think you live in a country that has a free market system, but someone doesn't want you, the consumer, to have any impact on health care costs.

How PR is leveraged to bullshit the public

Organizations leverage public relations techniques to manage crises, often utilizing specialized language to control narratives, freeze out ...